Å©¸®¼Ò½ºÅè ¼³±³ÇÐ ¿¬±¸¼Ò
title
  

|¿¬±¸¼Ò ¼Ò°³|
|°øÁö»çÇ×|
|¼³±³Çבּ¸½Ç|
|¼ö»çÇבּ¸½Ç|
|¼³±³ÄÁÆÛ·±½º|
|¼³±³ÄÚνºÄð|
|¼³±³ µ¿¿µ»ó|
|Ãßõ »çÀÌÆ®|
|Æ÷Åä °¶·¯¸®|
|¹æ¸í·Ï|
|°ü¸®ÀÚ|


ÇöóÅæÀÇ ¼ö»çÇÐ
¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç  (Homepage) 2018-03-18 22:16:45, Á¶È¸ : 9,105, Ãßõ : 1842
- SiteLink #1 : https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-rhetoric/
- SiteLink #2 : http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/gorgias.html
- Download #1 : Plato_1.jpg (63.8 KB), Download : 52

- Download #2 : Plato__Phaedrus.pdf (136.0 KB), Download : 51

ÇöóÅæÀº ±×ÀÇ ´ëÇ¥Àû ¼ö»çÇÐÀû Àú¼ú, ´ëÈ­·ÏÀΠ Gorgias¿Í Phaedrus¿¡¼­ ÂüµÈ ¼ö»çÇаú °ÅÁþµÈ ¼ö»çÇп¡ ´ëÇØ
³íÀÇÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ÇöóÅæÀº ¼ÒÇǽºÆ®µéÀÇ ¼ö»çÇÐÀ» °ÅºÎÇϰí ÂüµÈ ¼ö»çÇÐÀº º¯Áõ¹ý Dialectic¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇÕ´Ï´Ù. °í¸£±â¾Æ½º¿Í ÆÄ¿¡µå·ç½º¸¦ ¿µ¾î ¿ø¹®À¸·Î ÀÐÀ¸½Ã±â À§Çؼ­ À§ÀÇ ¸µÅ© 2¿Í ´Ù¿î·Îµå 2·Î °¡½Ã¸é µË´Ï´Ù.

±×¸®°í ¶Ç Çϳª Áß¿äÇÑ ÇöóÅæÀÇ ¼ö»çÇÐÀû Àú¼úÀº MenoÀÔ´Ï´Ù. »õ¼³±³ÇпÀÇ Å©·¡µ¶µµ ÀÌ ¸Þ³ëÀÇ ±³À°Ã¶ÇÐÀû ¿µÇâÀ»
¹ÞÀº ±âµ¶±³ ¼³±³ÇÐ, ±âµ¶±³ ¼ö»çÇÐÀ̶ó°í ÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ûÁßÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý ½º½º·Î ±ú´Ýµµ·Ï ¼³±³ÀÚ°¡ µ½´Â ¿ªÈ°À»
»êÆÄ·¯Ã· ÇØ¾ßÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ ÁÖ¼Ò¸¦ º¹»çÇϼż­ ÁÖ¼Òâ¿¡ ³ÖÀ¸½Ã¸é µË´Ï´Ù.

https://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/joel.wallenberg/ContextsJoelGeoff/meno.pdf

Plato (427–347 BC) famously outlined the differences between true and false rhetoric in a number of dialogues; particularly the Gorgias and Phaedrus dialogues wherein Plato disputes the sophistic notion that the art of persuasion (the sophists' art, which he calls "rhetoric"), can exist independent of the art of dialectic. Plato claims that since sophists appeal only to what seems probable, they are not advancing their students and audiences, but simply flattering them with what they want to hear. While Plato's condemnation of rhetoric is clear in the Gorgias, in the Phaedrus he suggests the possibility of a true art wherein rhetoric is based upon the knowledge produced by dialectic, and relies on a dialectically informed rhetoric to appeal to the main character, Phaedrus, to take up philosophy. Thus Plato's rhetoric is actually dialectic (or philosophy) "turned" toward those who are not yet philosophers and are thus unready to pursue dialectic directly. Plato's animosity against rhetoric, and against the sophists, derives not only from their inflated claims to teach virtue and their reliance on appearances, but from the fact that his teacher, Socrates, was sentenced to death after sophists' efforts.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

½ºÅÄÆ÷µå öÇлçÀü¿¡¼­ ¼Ò°³ÇÏ´Â ÇöóÅæÀÇ ¼ö»çÇаú ½ÃÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼­·ÐÀû ¼Ò°³ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÇöóÅæÀÇ ¼ö»çÇп¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ½±°Ô Àü¹ÝÀûÀÎ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ »¡¸®ÇÏ°Ô µµ¿ÍÁÝ´Ï´Ù.
¾Æ·¡ µÎ¹øÂ° ÆÐ·¯±×¶óÇÁÀÇ ¸ñÂ÷¿¡¼­ ÇöóÅæÀÇ ¼ö»çÇÐÀû Àú¼ú Àüü¸¦
Áöµµ¿Í °°ÀÌ ½±°Ô ÀÌÇØÇϰí À§ÀÇ ¸µÅ© 1 À¥»çÀÌÆ®·Î °¡½Ã¸é ÀÚ¼¼ÇÏ°Ô °³·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î
ÀÐÀ¸½Ç¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.

Plato on Rhetoric and Poetry

First published Mon Dec 22, 2003; substantive revision Thu Feb 4, 2016
Plato's discussions of rhetoric and poetry are both extensive and influential. As in so many other cases, he sets the agenda for the subsequent tradition. And yet understanding his remarks about each of these topics—rhetoric and poetry—presents us with significant philosophical and interpretive challenges. Further, it is not initially clear why he links the two topics together so closely (he suggests that poetry is a kind of rhetoric). Plato certainly thought that matters of the greatest importance hang in the balance, as is clear from the famous statement that ¡°there is an old quarrel between philosophy and poetry¡± (Republic, 607b5–6). In his dialogues, both this quarrel and the related quarrel between philosophy and rhetoric amount to clashes between comprehensive world-views—those of philosophy on the one hand, and of poetry or rhetoric on the other. What are these quarrels about? What does Plato mean by ¡°poetry¡± and ¡°rhetoric¡±? The purpose of this article is to analyze his discussions of rhetoric and poetry as they are presented in four dialogues: the Ion, the Republic, the Gorgias, and the Phaedrus. Plato is (perhaps paradoxically) known for the poetic and rhetoric qualities of his own writings, a fact which will also be discussed in what follows.

1. Introduction
2. Ion
3. Republic, Books II, III, X
3.1 Republic II
3.2 Republic III
3.3 Republic X
3.4 Concluding Observations about the Republic's ¡°quarrel¡±
4. Gorgias
5. Phaedrus
5.1 Rhetoric in the Phaedrus
5.2 Rhapsodes, Inspiration, and Poetry in the Phaedrus
6. Plato's Dialogues as Rhetoric and Poetry








  ÃßõÇÏ±â   ¸ñ·Ïº¸±â

¹øÈ£ Á¦¸ñ ÀÛ¼ºÀÚ ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ   Ãßõ Á¶È¸
113  Ã¥¼Ò°³ : ¼ö»çÇÐÀÇ ¿ª»ç    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/05/25 231 1345
112  PDF Journal: From Rhetoric to Violence    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/27 237 1502
111  PDF ¿µ¾î ³í¹® ¤Ñ Gay Rights Rhetoric    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/27 253 1496
110  Anti - LGBT Rhetoric ¤Ñ À§Å°¹é°ú ¿µ¾î    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/27 192 1426
109  PDF) Article -- Defining and Diminishing Hate Speech    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/18 306 1381
108  PDF) Journal-- The Essentials of Hate Speech    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/18 240 1649
107  PDF) Journal ¤Ñ Free Speech and Hate Speech    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/18 254 1489
106  PDF) Journal -- Rhetoric and Religion: Rediscovering Homiletics    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2023/01/18 251 1711
105  PDF) ÇÑ±Û¼Ò³í¹® ¤Ñ Hate Speech ¤Ñ Áõ¿ÀÀÇ ¼ö»çÇÐ    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2022/06/25 301 1773
104  Why Rhetoric? ¿Ö ¼ö»çÇÐÀÌ Áß¿äÇѰ¡? ¤Ñ ¿µ¾î    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2022/05/04 282 1862
103  µ¶ÀÏ¿¡¼­ ¼ö»çÇÐ °øºÎÇÏ±â ¤Ñ Æ¢ºù°Õ´ëÇÐ    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2022/05/04 272 1841
102  ¼ö»çÇÐÀÇ Èû - ¿ìÅ©¶óÀ̳ª ´ëÅë·ÉÀÇ ¿¬¼³    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2022/03/20 326 1557
101  ¸µÅ©- Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: a Resource for Preaching    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 699 3333
100  PDF Àú³Î- Redeeming Rhetoric:Augustines Use of Rhetoric - Sypert    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 576 2383
99  PDF ³í¹®- Imagination and Narratives in Preaching - Vinther    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 594 2602
98  PDF ³í¹®- Toward a Narrative Theory of Moral Discourse - Harsh    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 583 2634
97  PDF ³í¹® - Rhetoric of Homiletics - Riley    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 579 2438
96  PDF ³í¹® - Rhetoric, Composition and Preaching - Pearson    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 578 3504
95  PDF ³í¹® - RHETORICALLY-INFORMED HOMILETICAL APPROACH - Williams    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 585 2317
94  PDF ³í¹®-The Epistemic Power of Metaphor: A Rhetorical Model for Homiletics (292ÆäÀÌÁö)    ¹ÚÈñÃá ¸ñ»ç 2020/11/01 602 2415

    ¸ñ·Ïº¸±â   ÀÌÀüÆäÀÌÁö   ´ÙÀ½ÆäÀÌÁö [1] 2 [3][4][5][6][7]
       

Copyright 1999-2025 Zeroboard / skin by zero
Copyright : ck | Email : whrur@hanmail.net